2011年3月31日星期四

魏家祥和廖中莱先生,请你问心!

说,不必太过在乎个别字眼,要全面广义的看历史。
你说,这读本《连环扣》是为了达到更大的全面团结。

从马哈迪和土权鼓吹的大马来人主义,
到系统化的干训局课程 (不妨参考参加BTN后,官员们都发表怎样的感言),
到巫统数十年来系统化的想要干掉多源流教育系统,公开批评华小和独中是团结的绊脚石,
历史科必须及格,加强本土历史(依巫统为准),到《连环扣》成了马来文科必读必考本,
这一切放在一起,难道还不明显吗?

记得吗?马哈迪和巫统领袖们不是成天呐喊,
“只要华印裔一天不放弃读华印文,土著非土著就不能有平权!”。

好了,要是华印裔真的舍弃学习华文丹米尔文,
当你我他的孩子,只有完全从马来文教课书学习历史时,
在“更大的全民团结”命题下,你可以想象他们会如何扭曲历史吗?

毕竟语文语言,只是藉口!
你没有看到上世纪90年代,他叔父兄弟印尼的排华吗?
他们没有华人名字,他们没有华文华语,
结果他们还是被杀,妻女被蹂躏,财产被掠夺。

野蛮就是野蛮,
任何事情都可以是他的理由!

无论他如何包装!
对,我就是对这样的政权完全没有信心!

中学生语文课读本和必考本

描述中国清末民初人文的文学作品不少,赛珍珠 Pearl S Duck 的《Good Earth》,近代Jung Chang的《Wild Swans, 鸿》,描述当代中国人人性黑暗面的作品如老舍的《骆驼祥子》,鲁迅的《祝福》,甚至是张艺谋的电影《老井》,《红高粱》,《大红灯笼高高挂》,《菊豆》,《菊豆打官司》,《活着》等等。

那年是1994年吧,在英国诺城学生宿舍里,大概所有的同学都在猛温习,准备考试的时候,我把什么液体动力学,什么热力学都放一旁,花了2天不眠不休的,把《Wild Swans》给一口气看完了。我只能说这样的作品的魅力,在于它片断的记载了一些人事物,让你穿越时空,进入那个时代,那个时空,亲自感受局部事情的发生。看完了留给我什么?惊叹那个年代的女人肩负的重担和坚毅。

同样的,上述说的所有作品,它只是一个时代下的记忆,但这绝对不是这个民族的全部精神面貌。那个时代,难道就没有就义成仁的?没有为孩子女儿遭遇悲痛的?没有尊重,专一,于太太的人?

企图通过这样的文学作品,与国家干训局的主张如出一辙,《Anak  Kecil Main Api》,贯彻大马来人主义的核心论调。以个别的遭遇(如果不是文学的创作人事物),刻画一道深深的仇恨和烙印。马来人是这土地的主人,其他外来者是侵略者,掠夺者,践踏马来民族的尊严者。

为什么不把,戳穿把霸权推倒,渐渐自己变成另一个霸权,George Orwell 的世界名著《动物庄园》列入必读本?

有人问过我,华文独中时代留给我什么记忆,其中一个不可磨灭的,是图书馆里,10万册书籍中,包括Harper Lee 的《To Kill a Mockingbird》,是那种超越民族伸张正义当主角的读本,还有老师和校长不停催足大家要多读多看,开阔视野的重要性。

说起中学马来文必读的课本《连环扣》,我还是感到不忿。

2011年3月30日星期三

震惊

《连环扣》究竟是什么东西?只见这些人吵了好一阵子。我是从来没有自己看过,不知道有什么大惊小怪的。今天看了这样的摘要,我被吓到了,极度震惊。

作为一本小说我没有意见,随你爱怎样写也行。其他人也可以写一些民族好吃懒做,像狗那样跟母亲乱伦是家常便饭,贪得无厌,不守信用。。。。。对吗?

但作为一本学生必读,必考的文学作品,是不可被接受。充满偏见,聚焦在某个时代背景下个别群体的黑暗面,扭曲的,暗暗的种下种族仇恨。这不是扭曲历史,然后把这个扭曲的历史强行灌输给下一代,是什么?

天啊!

*******************************************
转载:

以下是联署文告附录的《连环扣》小说争议部分摘要:

贩卖孩童

1.有什么吃什么。如果有树根也吃。我们要求别人施舍。我们偷。我们没有女儿。如果有我们卖女儿(页119-120,Kim Lock说)

2.“他在这里做得很好,老板说Cing Huat很勤劳,如果你要卖他要买”......他(Kim Lock)没想过要卖这个独生子。如果是女儿他说不定会卖。但是现在他有什么理由要卖?那时刻他一直在心里寻找理由(页151)

3.但是如果Kim Lock卖孩子,他可以赚到更多(页155)

4.Kok Leng劝他卖掉Cing Huat。幸好他没答应,否则Cing Huat不再是他孩子。如果是女儿他肯定会卖掉(页160)

好色 / 吸鸦片

5.今晚他一定要和妓女Gweek Cin睡,她苗条瘦长、平胸和有双小脚(页155)

6.第200-203页,Kim Lock 带Mei Hwa去吸鸦片,每次见面吸鸦片后,他们都发生性关系。Kim Lock要带Mei Hwa回家住,儿子Cing Huat不同意,他要把妈妈从唐山带来。Kim Lock 拒绝他的建议,理由是“这会用很长的时间。我们不够钱”

7.第457-458页,共产党干部Teck Hock企图强暴Poh Eng

贪婪 / 视钱如命

8.虽然民族谚语的确有言:“如果有钱,你将成为勇敢的汉人,如果没钱,连成为汉人都难”(页482)

9.金钱没有敌人,敌人是阻止我们找吃的人(页141)

10.在像这样的陌生大城市,人们不能有同情心,如果同情(别人)我们不能发达致富。这里钱成为衡量标准。这世界钱是第二个神(页155-156)

11.他开始感到,在这南方之地,除了令吉之外,祖先的精神毫无帮助。有了钱,对女人身体的欲望也越来越迫切。如果Kim Sui可以结婚及把女人收藏在城市,为什么他不能收藏女人?这有什么错?(页198)

歧视 / 欺骗 / 剥削马来人

12.Cing Huat已开始能一点一点和番哪(Huan Na)说话,他已经知道他们是马来人,但是他比较喜欢叫他们番哪或者马来鬼,就像他的族人通常称呼他们一般(页179)

13.“Cina Panjang说那些土地全都是他的资产。我们养的牛也是他的资产。我爸爸已押了给他”(页88)

14.Seman说那片地已全部典当给Cina Panjang, 那华人命令Seman离开甘榜(页92)

15.......我们被法律保障的土地典当给外族。我们不能做什么...我听到这个故事感到心寒。我们的资产会逐渐被典当。我们不能帮上什么忙吗?“只有一条路。如果我们意识到和觉悟。别再有人步向Pak Musa的后尘”(第95-96页)

以下是小说原文:

Jual Anak

1.Kita makan apa yang dapat. Akar-akar kayu kalau ada. Kita minta sedekah. Kita curi. Kita tak punya anak perempuan. Kalau ada anak perempuan kita boleh jual. (Kim Lock, MS 119-120)

2.“Dia sudah bagus kerja sini, itu tauke bilang Cing Huat banyak rajin dan kalau lu mau jual dia mau beli”……dia (Kim Lock) belum pernah teringat mahu jual anaknya yang tunggal itu. Entahlah kalau anak itu perempuan. Tetapi sekarang apa sebab dia mahu jual? Dia mencari-cari sebab itu dalam hatinya pada waktu itu (MS 151)

3.Tetapi kalau Kim Lock mahu menjual anaknya itu dia boleh dapat untung lebih banyak lagi (MS 155)

4.Kok Leng mendesaknya supaya menjual Cing Huat. Untung dia tidak banyak cakap, kalau tidak Cing Huat bukan anaknya lagi. Kalau anak perempuan tentu dia sudah jual (MS 160)

Gila Perempuan / Menghisap Candu

5.Malam ini dia mesti tidur dengan perempuan loki Gweek Cin, yang kurus langsing dan berdada rata serta berkaki kecil itu (Kim Lock, MS 155)

6.Muka Surat 200-203, Kim Lock membawa Mei Hwa untuk menghisap candu dan mengadakan hubungan seks dengan dia setiap kali bertemu begitu. Kim Lock mahu membawa Mei Hwa tingga bersama-sama mereka, Cing Huat tidak bersetuju dan meminta panggil ibunya dari Tung San ke sini, Kim Lock menolaknya dengan alasan “Itu akan memakan masa terlalu lama. Wang Kita juga tidak cukup”

7.MS 457-458, orang tua pasukan komunis Teck Hock cuba merogol Poh Eng tetapi diselamatkan

Gelojoh / Wang ialah Tuhan

8.Walaupun benar ada pepatah bangsanya mengatakan “Kalau ada wang, kamu menjadi seorang anak Han yang berani, kalau tidak wang susah nak jadi anak Han pun” (MS 482)

9.Soal duit tak ada musuh, musuh ialah orang-orang yang mau menghalang kita cari makan (MS 141)

10.Dalam kota besar dan asing serupa ini orang tidak boleh kasihan, kalau kasihan kita tidak boleh kaya. Di sini wang yang menjadi ukuran. Dalam dunia ini wang itu Tuhan nombor dua (MS 155-156)

11.Dia sudah mulai sedar bahawa di rantau selatan ini , bukan semangat nenek moyang yang dapat menolong, melainkan wang ringgit. Wangnya ada dan keinginan pada tubuh perempuan pun makin mendesak. Kalau Kim Sui boleh kahwin dan menyimpan perempuan di bandar, maka mengapa pula dia tidak boleh menyimpan perempuan. Apa salahnya? (MS 198)

Diskriminasi / Menipu / Mengeksploitasi Orang Melayu

12.Cing Huat pun sudah boleh sedikit-sedikit bercakap dengan Huan na, dia sudah tahu orang-orang itu orang Melayu, tetapi dia lebih senang memanggil mereka Huan na atau Malai Kuai sahaja, seperti yang biasa dipanggil oleh bangsanya (MS 179)

13.“Cina Panjang kata tanah-tanah itu semuanya haknya belaka. Lembu yang kami bela itu pun hartanya juga. Bapa saya telah gadai kepadanya” (MS 88)

14.Kata Seman tanah itu semua sudah digadai pada Cina Panjang tu, dan orang Cina tu pun dah suruh Seman ini keluar dari kampong tersebut (MS 92)

15....... tanah-tanah kita yang dilindungi oleh undang-undang tu tergadai kepada bangsa asing. Kita tak upaya nak buat apa-apa……kecut perut sayaa mendengar cerita ni. Lama-lam habis harta benda kita tergadai. Tak bolehkah kita menolongnya? “Cuma satu jalan saja. Itu pun kalau orang-orang kita mau sedar, mau insaf. Jangan ada orang yang ikut jejak pak musa tu” (MS 95-96)

2011年3月29日星期二

如果这不是,什么才是?如果他不是,谁才是?

土权说有6个部门由该死的非马来人任常任秘书,会阻碍马来人经济议程进展,
他说这是为了确保国家安宁。你知道啦,没有给他,他就要烧你的店,烧你的车咯!
他说土权不是种族主义,那什么才是种族主义?

“法治人”纳兹里说大选时的赠品,好处,分发选举糖果,不是贿选
如果国阵的行为不叫贿选,那什么才是贿选?

马哈迪说他没有用内安法令进行茅草行动践踏民主,他没有践踏司法制度,
如果马哈迪不是践踏马来西亚民主和司法制度,那谁才是?

敦达因说外资更关心法律公平多过低生意成本
如果贪污舞弊滥权,衍生出的执法司法不公,不是叫外资却步的原因,什么才是?

全国总警长反问有什么理由可以逮捕那些偷录,放映情色影片的人?
如果这不叫选择性执法,执法不公,什么才是?

说谎必须负责?算了罢!
杀人放火,欺压强取,贪腐掠夺,栽赃嫁祸,还是明目张胆,
说谎,黑白颠倒的事,能算什么罪?

政治人物说

他说“马华和自由民主党,有发表意见的权力”。

如果你不会解读,我想自愿给你一些参考,

(1)一般人的说法就是“随你便,要说什么你说,我不管!“,

(2)粗俗一些的“睬你都傻!”,

(3)客家话说“毛吊!泥吹咩”,

(4)广东话说“超!”,

(5)通俗英语说“Fxxk-off, I dont give a shxx of what you said ”,

2011年3月26日星期六

给LDP的公开信

看见你的话语中充满了苦涩,
如果你吃到的是苦涩,那马来西亚人民所尝到的是沾了糖的砒霜。

如果你的遭遇是被边缘和垄断,
那我们就是被压在刀俎任人鱼肉的一块骨头,毫无天日,永无止境的被压迫。

你的呐喊,向人民的控诉,像是糟糠控诉他那负心的爆发户老公,
你的苦,你的不平遭遇,我们感同身受,
因为我们的遭遇比你更甚百倍。

如果,一天自民党得到巫统委任副首席部长,部长职位,副议长,数个主席副主席职位,
你的苦楚就完全消失了,像你的薄情郎回心转意了,
那你就快乐了吗?那你就是公平了吗?你就快快乐乐的继续你的生活吗?

人民呢?你还会记得我们所受比你苦百倍的痛楚吗?

LDP,

If what you have gone through in BN, is called bully by UMNO,
We, the people, have been oppressed for past half a century.

If you call the BN in Sabah, as monopoly by UMNO.
We, the people, have been victims of BN cartel.

We fully comprehend how you feel, for we have grieve 100 times of what you have gone through.

If BN have returned you, what you claimed ownership of LDP, not to dispute the rightfulness of your claim,
the DCM post, minister posts, Deputy Speaker post, chairmen and assitant chairmenships,
then you would return to make peace to all your brothers and sisters in BN, and live happy ever after?

Would you still remember us? Whom you seek refuge when you have little setback?

****************************************

装载:PRESS STATEMENT BY CHIN SHU YING LDP YOUTH LEADER

First of all, I wish to congratulate YB Datuk Yee for his appointment as the new Deputy Chief Minister. With two DCM in the cabinet, I am sure PBS will be able to solve all the problems face by our community and fulfill their requests.

LDP has only our self to blame for losing the DCM post to PBS because we are the one that help them come back to BN and to regain their present strength. We even go all out to help them to retain the Batu Sapi Parliamentary seat in the recent by-election. Their winning candidate was eventually appointed as Sabah Credit Corporation Chairman, a post held by LDP. It is only right for PBS to get the DCM post because LDP has yet to master the skill of stabbing a friend from behind, especially those who help you the most. We have also yet to master the skill of polishing shoes. We also do not have the discipline to become a good ‘Yes’ man and we do not have the skill to go all out to protect the Chief Master regardless he is right or wrong.

The Chief Minister is 100% right when he said that his door is always open for LDP to talk. LDP leaders including our President have been meeting him to talk and talk. In fact, I think we talk too much. I am sure the CM is not deaf and has listened to every single word when we talk to him. Yet, how come after so many meeting and talking so many time to him, LDP seem to lost all their positions one by one since he become the Chief Minister ? We have lost not only our DCM and cabinet quota, we also lost the Deputy Speaker post, the Senator post and the numerous Chairman and Deputy Chairman post. We are left with a single Assistance Minister post in the State. I don’t think we should blame the CM for this act of systematic marginalisation. We can only blame our self for not mastering the skill of talking and begging. I am very sure that once we have master the skill of begging, the CM will give us back all the positions which are rightfully belong to us.

As to GERAKAN, I also want to congratulate them for gaining 3 YB and 2 Minister in Sabah. LDP should also learn from them. It is not important that they are wiped out in Penang and never contested a single seat in Sabah in the last election. What is more important is the skill to collect what other people regard as rubbish and turn them into gold. Since they now have a strong hold in Sandakan with 3 YB, I will suggest to my President to offer the Sandakan seat to their President as a safe seat in the next election as their President has yet to find a winnable seat in Penang. As comrade in BN, we must try our best to help them as people now called them a Party that is no longer relevant in West Malaysia.

So, my friends and supporters of LDP, don’t blame the Chief Minister, don’t blame PBS and don’t blame GERAKAN. Blame our self. We are down and out, but we are definitely not finish.

Chin Shu Ying

2011年3月25日星期五

请听听她如何说

这是一个在Articulations看到的短片。对于她,只有钦佩,当然,也看到她的美丽。

我在想,是什么造就一个人的人格?我想宗教必然是其中一环吧?

恰恰是她人格发挥出的魅力,让我不禁要问问自己无知,检讨自己对这一个宗教的肤浅认识。对她的所作所为(据她所言)感动,让我对她的宗教信仰肃然起敬,远远胜过那些那些虚伪的假卫道人士老师门的长篇大论,布道和道德利剑。

我有一个小小的恳求,请不要批评宗教。因为,我们只看到个人的行为举止和修为,而不是宗教本身对吗?恰恰也是一些人的行为,让人感到宗教的宽阔和光芒。

2011年3月24日星期四

岂可叫我不荒唐?

坐要有坐着的姿势,站着要有站的姿势,饭桌要有饭桌的礼仪,衣着要合适场合的规格,长幼有序,场合礼节。一切不合乎这些次序,规格,认定行为规范的举止,叫失礼。严重超出这样的规范的,就恐怕叫荒唐了。

今天完全不要提起法律责任这回事,
恒河沙数中,随手拿来做说明的例子,纯属不幸。

立法的听命于人,
执法的无法无天,
反腐的唯利是图,
保卫的掠夺强抢,
那里有选举,就巧合轮到到哪里派福利金,派牛奶,吃喝玩乐,大抽奖!
那里有反对示威,就有警察红头镇暴兵;与这个政权同调的,路上连蚂蚁也没有拦你的路!

合理吗?失礼吗?荒唐吗?

好了,
你既然去看得周星驰的无厘头戏,你会大骂无厘头吗?
你既然看卡通片,你会埋怨它的童话情节吗?
你既然参加变装舞会,你还会埋怨大家的奇装异服?
你活在“一切可能乐园”,你会惊讶不可能变得可能吗?
不这样,才叫失礼,荒唐呢!

选择性偏帮性的,不公平不公正的执法;为权势服务的司法;挡我去路的,杀掉干掉;喜欢的要的资源,任取任拿;背叛者得到奖赏;不信神的人用神的名誉警惕人们。在一个荒唐的政权,荒唐的人事物,难道不是理所当然的吗?

2011年3月22日星期二

己所不欲勿施于人

看见这样乱象丛生的社会和国家,想要长篇大论的细数我们自己的不是?
看见他人处处叫人感动敬佩的举止,细数别人的亮点?

或许是该从这句话重新开始,己所不欲勿施于人。
每个人做到,这该是多么美好的世界啊!我在想。

暂时搁置一下,让我好好的想想。

2011年3月18日星期五

去他妈的马来西亚政府和马来西亚机场公司!FUCK-OFF!

亚洲行空在亚庇国际机场第二终点站运作,马行Maswing在第一终点站。两个终点站就是同一条跑道,一个左一个右,一个在东一个在西边,车程约3公里。

Maswing的早上7点满座,只好坐亚行,从亚庇飞山打根。亚行离开山打根最后一班机是下午2点多,时间太仓卒,只好乘Maswing 晚上7点多班机回亚庇。刚好太太乘学校假期,带着孩子回娘家度假,叫同事接送是太早了。只好一大清早把车停在第二终点站停车场,回到第一终点站,打算乘的士过去就是了。

你知道这第一终点站到第二终点站要多少钱吗?RM30!虽然可以向公司报销公费,但是这太叫人生气了!

1。这个马来西亚机场,只允许这些机场的士营运,所以是政府允许独家垄断!

2。独家垄断后,政府可以让业者为所欲为,完全任意宰杀?3公里要RM30合理吗?

3。为什么不能公开,让的士计程收费?

4。难道这不是不必要的加重沙巴做生意的成本吗?这不是加重生活成本吗?

难道旅客就应该被无理的敲诈?难道消费者应该逆来顺受?
难道消费人没有付机场服务费吗?难道不是大马机场公司的责任提供连接?
难道这贵得离谱链接两个终点站的的士费,就是沙巴政府要求亚行搬到第一终点站,合理的要求吗?

去你他妈的大马机场公司,希望你们要了不义之财,有一天,你要成倍的吐回出来!

去你他妈的马来西亚政府!允许独家垄断,monopoly! 关起门来敲诈消费者,收取数倍的不合理利润!

去你他妈的沙巴政府!斩脚趾避沙虫!欺善怕恶!

2011年3月15日星期二

政治献金对上了人民利益!

各位,关心马来西亚前途的人民,绑好你的安全带,血淋淋的真相来了!

Sime Darby 前首席执行员Ahmad Zubir 和其他4人被民事诉讼失职(breach of duties),造成21亿的亏损! Ahmad Zubir可能 要求马哈迪,亚都拉,拿吉等等的政治人物供证,这些年来,政治献金,在马来西亚政坛是存在的,包括2008大选,16场的补选等等!

当然,今天,副首相,DPM @ son of Mahathir说,这个马来西亚政治是允许政治献金滴!接受政治献金是合法滴!

好了,几个建议,

(1)既然有政治献金这回事,请选举委员会要求,所有政治人物和政党,把历年的政治献金公布!以后全部必须公布可以吗?

(2)基本上在民主国家(来吧,不要一直拿马来西亚和津巴布韦这样的国家比较,与先进一点的来比好不好!),政党和政治人物要通报政治献金来源,不可以接受超过某个数额的献金。为什么?因为这样才能杜绝“对价关系”----你现在给那么多,我中选当政府掌握资源,公家资源当个人资产,给回你多少个工程或准证!

告诉马来西亚人民,这些所有大型官营公司,到底给了多少?多少进了口袋?其他怎样用了?哦,这官营公司为什么要给你钱,然后派给人民?不能够给别人派?

副首相啊!副首相!
收政治献金是合法,没有犯法的,没错!
但是不诚实,滥权,对价,贪污,侵犯人民利益的政权,就是犯法的!

************************************************************************
转载:Political contributions legal, says DPM on ex-Sime CEO’s defence

PUTRAJAYA, March 15 — Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin dismissed former Sime Darby Bhd chief executive Datuk Seri Ahmad Zubir Murshid’s defence to reveal the conglomerate’s political contributions, saying today corporations are free to contribute to any party in Malaysia.

The deputy prime minister also denied that Sime practises political donations and explained that it is normal for any company to make contributions.

“As a company or any other party, they can make contributions to any party. That is up to the management but we will wait because I do not know what he will reveal and it is not against the law (to give contributions),” he told reporters during a press conference.

Sources told The Malaysian Insider that Ahmad Zubir’s (picture) defence is to call Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, predecessors Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad apart from revealing the hand of some top leaders in the government-linked conglomerate’s decision-making over the years.

This includes political donations during elections and by-elections. There have been 16 by-elections since the last general election in 2008, eight were won by the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) and the rest by Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

The suit over RM2.1 billion losses incurred by Sime had named Ahmad Zubir and four others, Datuk Mohamad Shukri Baharom, the former executive vice-president of the energy and utilities division; the division’s chief financial officer Abdul Rahim Ismail; the division’s oil and gas unit chief Abdul Kadir Alias; and Mohd Zaki Othman, from Sime Engineering.

The defendants are expected to claim that the conglomerate’s loss-making ventures in Bakun and Qatar were public knowledge to even top government leaders.

“They have all been sued for breaches of duties owed to the Sime Darby Group,” the company said in a statement released on December 23, 2010.

In its statement of claim, Sime alleged that the five accused acted as a “decision-making unit” in the energy and utilities division and were responsible for the division’s actions and omissions.

Sime further alleged that the accused had been grossly negligent for allowing Sime Darby Engineering to pursue engineering, procurement, construction, installation and commissioning (EPCIC) projects in which it had no prior experience.

The five men were also accused of awarding EPCIC jobs to similarly inexperienced subcontractors and for failing to pursue claims for work not done.

Sime’s two suits follow its announcement in September that a forensic audit into the energy and utilities division had established a prima facie case of foul play and a failure to carry out its duties and obligations.

The conglomerate’s woes first came to light in May when then-chief executive Ahmad Zubir was asked to take a leave of absence prior to the expiry of his contract following the discovery of RM964 million in cost overruns from four energy and utilities projects.

The massive cost overruns bled the division and led to the announcement of Sime’s first-ever quarterly loss of RM308.6 million that same month.

In the previous corresponding quarter, Sime had posted a profit of RM150.6 million.

The losses were the first since its formation in 2007, when it was merged with two other government-controlled plantation groups.

Sime has also filed a RM92.2 million suit against Ahmad Zubir, Shukri and Abdul Rahim for breach of trust and duty over the Bakun dam project.

The second civil suit, which names Sime and three of its subsidiaries as plaintiffs, was filed at the Commercial Court registry here through law firm Zaid Ibrahim & Co last December 24.

撒谎者下台!

啊!有人说被唱后庭花, 马来西亚首相和第一夫人亲自见面,听问案情

可能令千千万万人民受污染的稀土厂运作,你说不知道有没有许可证!

这是因为在国阵政府的眼里,唱后庭花,是比千千万万人民的福利更重要吗?

撒谎者下台!不称职者下台!

要求撒谎的副首相下台

先不说马来西亚宪法下赋予人民的宗教自由的权利。

2009 年被内政部没收的5千本的马来文圣经,到2011年3月的今天,副首相说还没有被内阁讨论如何处置。

(1)为什么2年半还没有讨论?是事情不重要吗?是你们十来场补选,还有部长们繁忙的环游世界,巡回参加研讨会太忙,比较重要,所以没有时间讨论?

(2)没收圣经是不是合法的?

(3)一边只允许人家学马来文,说多源流学校是国家团结的绊脚石,另一边有不允许人家用马来文的圣经,所以你是不是意图强迫同化,抹杀人民有自由选择宗教的权利?

(4)那内政部长2010年6月在国会证实,可以领出被没收圣经的讲话,是误导国会?是骗人民?是没有实权的?

(5) 连可不可以买有没有BPA奶瓶的决定,也是内阁做的集体决定,内政部长没有通过内阁自己做决定?

Liar, Liar, Liar!意图欺骗人民的副首相下台,下台,下台!

*************************************************************************
转载:DPM denies approval for Bible release

PUTRAJAYA, March 15 — Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin denied today that the Cabinet had approved the release of 5,000 Malay Bibles confiscated by the Home Ministry since 2009.

The deputy prime minister said that Cabinet had yet to discuss the status of the seized Bibles.

His remarks come after DAP MP Tony Pua unveiled documents yesterday showing Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein had issued orders last June for the release of 5,100 Malay-language Bibles currently impounded at Port Klang.

The home minister had said over the weekend that the Bibles had been impounded due to the ministry’s pending court appeal on the Catholic weekly The Herald’s use of the word “Allah” in its publications.

But the Petaling Jaya Utara MP revealed that Hishammuddin, in his written reply to Parliament on June 7 last year, had announced that a notice had already been issued to the books’ importers urging them retrieve their consignment.

The Malaysian Insider also published a ministry letter dated June 10, 2010, where a senior official wrote that the appeal by the book’s importer, Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM), had been considered and the ministry had agreed to release the consignment.

Muhyiddin appeared today to deny knowledge of any approval.

“We will discuss in Cabinet this week. Cabinet has yet to discuss,” he said during a press conference today.

The Malaysian Insider had reported that Christian groups had been given conflicting instructions concerning the release of the Bibles shipped in from Indonesia and seized by Customs officers in March 2009 because they contained the word “Allah”.

The matter is a touchy issue in Malaysia where Islam is the official religion and Muslim officials are against non-Islamic religious books printed in Bahasa Malaysia or containing the word “Allah”, the name of god in the faith which is outlawed for use by other religions.

It is understood that Christian leaders had broached the matter with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak at the Christmas open house last year.

The BSM imported 5,000 Alkitab Berita Baik from Indonesia on March 23, 2009, but the Malay Bibles together with 100 copies of other Christian literature were confiscated and detained by the Home Ministry at Port Klang.

BSM’s repeated attempts to clear up the confusion with the ministry helmed by Hishammuddin — who oversees the Immigration and Customs departments — at its highest-level of command have been met with sympathy but not action.

There is also a similar incident involving another Christian group, the Gideons, which had its shipment of 10,000 Malay-language Bibles detained in Kuching in 2009; but had the confiscation order lifted after Putrajaya intervened directly.

BSM was reported as saying that it has a strong legal case.

But being a Christian organisation, it is reluctant to take legal action unless forced to, like what the Catholic Church did with its Herald newspaper case.

The group noted that the Court of Appeal’s delay in hearing the controversial “Allah” suit, 15 months after the High Court ruled Christians have a constitution right to use the word, and that it had impacted on its case as well.

狼对羊的保证

有两个相关的小故事是这样的,

有个人死了,生前借了大笔钱给一个朋友,在下葬的时候,这个朋友写了一张抬头写着这个死者名字的支票,放到棺木里去,然后大声的对死者家属宣告,"朋友,借你的钱还清了!"。

另一个卖沥水机的老板,打破市场保用期10年的传统,个人给客户100年的保用保证。朋友问他是不是疯了,这人悠哉游哉的回答,“朋友,我现在已经87岁,等客人要来换的时候,我不知道还在不在呢!”

一个完全不必负责的政府,从来没有人对高楼倒塌,对频频长巴意外,对新运动场倒塌,对数以十亿的丑闻,下台道歉以示道义上负责,实质上的保证负责就别说了。一个人格破产的政客,大大声叫人民不要担心,保证核子发电厂安全!

连一个漏水也管不好,连政府办公柜台的基本次序也守不了,交通灯街灯倒垃圾通沟渠都要议员才办到,要保证核子发电厂安全啊!省一点啦!

这样的保证,值得多少斤两?算了吧,我连眼尾瞄一下都嫌多余!

最大的危机

温家宝说:中国最大的危机是腐败。

马来西亚最大的危机,是人民的短视和愚惑。

那“我是主人,我有特权”党,
那些执政附属党政客的意而不觉,觉而不醒,
那些为执政党效力的“独立执法,司法和立法单位”,
叫危机吗?

不,那些是国家末期肿瘤,烂透了,
唯一的可以做的,是切除。

2011年3月12日星期六

U-Tube 的撤了,这里还可以看

奇怪,那么快就被撤了。

大概有人投诉这片子是诬蔑国誉吧?那做这事的人,是不是有损国体呢?

马国官员醉酒对专柜小姐上下其手。

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=187916967910001&oid=151523654862808&comments

2011年3月11日星期五

你醒醒,你醒醒!别再每天醉生梦死了!

马哈迪的宪法马来人理论(Constituitional Malay)-----不管你是印度,印尼,菲律宾,阿拉伯来的,只要你信回教,讲马来话,活马来传统,你就是马来人,你就是这片土地的主人。

这个土著非土著(Bumiputra & None-Bumiputra),对华裔印裔马来西亚人的50年的霸道欺凌,个个领域的固打优先门槛,打压欺凌,用作自肥朋党,已经不再是什么好大写特写的。你喜欢不喜欢,反正也起不了什么作用。

纵使大家从世界其它大陆来到这里,他坚持自己变成主人。好了,把所谓非土著,干掉了。

好了,原住民(Orang Asli)卡达山人(Kadazan),杜顺人(Dusun),姆律人(Murut),达雅(Dayak)等等,你们就醒醒,求求你,醒醒吧!你要再醉生梦死了。当欺压者把一些“非土著”公民干掉后,你们这些“非马来人土著”的末日还会远吗?

这个时候,马哈迪说什么?
“The Orang Asli did not have more rights than the Malays to claim Malaysia as their own, as they did not set up their own states and governments.”
The former prime minister said giving Orang Asli greater rights to claim Malaysia as their own would be like handing back the United States, Australia and New Zealand to the Native American, Maori and aborigine natives of those countries respectively.
“In Malaysia, the Orang Asli are as much citizens of the country as are the people of other races. They had never set up their own states and governments,” he wrote in his blog yesterday.”
马哈迪现在说,马来人肯定比原住民Orang Asli (他肯定指卡达山,杜顺,姆律,达雅人等等)更有权力(Rights)宣称马来西亚的拥有权!包括沙巴砂劳越!

他说“要是把拥有权交回给这些原住民,就像把美国交回给红印第安人,把澳洲交回给阿波利津人,纽西兰交回给毛利人一样。”

哈哈哈!终于等到了,你们这些土人Orang Asli ,卡达山,杜顺,姆律,达雅人, Bidayuh等等,这片土地交回给你们吗?休想啦!这个时候,刚刚从印度,印尼,阿拉伯,菲律宾来的,宪法马来人,才是这片土地的主人!这就是真正的马来主权至上的真面目!Yes,the real face of  "Malay Supremacy"!

Joseph Pairin Kintingan, Joseph Kurup, Bernard Dompok, Maximus Ongkili 你们为什么沉默?

*****************************************************************************

转载:Dr M: Malay claim to country stronger than Orang Asli’s

KUALA LUMPUR, March 11 — Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad yesterday said the Orang Asli did not have more rights than the Malays to claim Malaysia as their own, as they did not set up their own states and governments.


The former prime minister said giving Orang Asli greater rights to claim Malaysia as their own would be like handing back the United States, Australia and New Zealand to the Native American, Maori and aborigine natives of those countries respectively.
“In Malaysia, the Orang Asli are as much citizens of the country as are the people of other races. They had never set up their own states and governments,” he wrote in his blog yesterday.

Malaysia’s longest-serving prime minister said that when Europeans and even the Japanese occupiers came to Malaysia, they had dealt with and acknowledged the Malay governments.

Dr Mahathir, who is now patron of right-wing Malay rights group Perkasa, has been vigorously defending the special position of Malays of late, and last week dismissed claims that Malays are immigrants just like Chinese and Indians.

Although admitting his Indian roots, he argued that Arabs, Indians and Indonesians who adopted the Malay language, practised Malay culture and embraced Islam have become constitutional Malays through assimilation.

“I would not say I am a Malay or Malaysian of ethnic Indian origin. My mother tongue and home language is Malay, my culture and tradition is Malay and I am a Muslim. The constitution defines a Malay as a person who habitually speaks Malay, practises Malay custom and tradition and is a Muslim,” he had said.

The country’s colonisers had dealt only with the Malay rulers, said Dr Mahathir. — file picIn yesterday’s posting, Dr Mahathir said that it “could be” the case that Orang Asli had populated Peninsular Malaysia before the Malays but argued that world history showed this did not accord them immutable claim to the land.

“If we consider that the Orang Asli have more rights to claim Malaysia as their own then we should acknowledge and respect the rights of the Red Indians, the Maoris, the Australian aborigines and all the other aborigines to be given back the land we now call America, Australia, New Zealand, etc.

“Perhaps in recognition of their rights, they are now not so ill-treated and killed as they were when the Europeans seized their lands. But this is not the same as declaring that the countries belong to the people originally found there,” he said.

Dr Mahathir, who was PM from 1981 to 2003, also said that while the Aztecs and Mayans had established governments in South America before Europeans settled in the region, their Spanish and Portuguese conquerors were now considered as natives of the land.

He said that Malaysia’s former colonial masters — the British, Portuguese and Dutch — recognised the Malay states and signed treaties with them.

The Japanese who occupied Malaysia during World War II also acknowledged the Malay states, he added.

“Of course when the British came back, they had to gain the assent of the Malay rulers in order to set up the Malayan Union. All subsequent agreements were with Malay rulers and Malay political leaders,” he wrote.

“It is important to note that the Malay rulers only recognised Malays as their natural ‘rakyat’. They also recognised ‘Orang Asli’ and non-Malays who had been assimilated as ‘rakyat’. However, non-Malays who continued to identify themselves with their countries of origin were not regarded as rakyat,” Dr Mahathir said.

He wrote that after the Malayan Union was formed in 1946, the concept of citizenship was introduced but still those “recognised as rakyat of the rulers were acknowledged through what came to be regarded as special positions,” referring to the special position of the Malays and native tribes in the constitution.

Dr Mahathir claimed that the right of non-Bumiputeras to practise their own culture was also “a special position.”

“The constitution also made it clear that the non-Malay citizens also have special position. Thus they may retain their original identity, use their own [mother tongue] and perpetuate their own culture. They also have the right to teach in their own languages in government supported primary schools and can set up their own private secondary schools,” he wrote.

He claimed, however, that Malaysians would like to see the end of all special privileges, and so Malaysians should be “speaking and teaching in one national language, practitioners of one national culture, and owing loyalty only to this beloved country, Malaysia.”

Dr Mahathir has in recent years stepped up his defence of the constitutional position of the Malays, resulting in accusations that he was playing the race card in an attempt to shore up support for Umno.

Since making significant gains in the 2008 general election, the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has been pushing for reforms to the country’s affirmative action policies which are widely seen as favouring the Malay-Bumiputera communities.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is expected to call for a general election in either late 2011 or early 2012, with investors and Malaysians waiting to see if he will implement reforms to match his rhetoric after a series of policy reversals.

While Najib liberalised some parts of the economy, he has shied away from big subsidy cuts or tax reforms and softened an earlier stand on reforming preferential equity ownership rules for the Malays.

Analysts expect Najib may be willing to push through reforms after the next general election, but only if he wins a strong mandate.

If he fails to restore Barisan Nasional’s two-thirds parliamentary majority, he will likely come under heavier pressure from Malay activist groups such as Perkasa who are opposed to what they view as the dismantling of “Malay constitutional rights”.

2011年3月10日星期四

馬來西亞人伸鹹豬手又尿褲子喔

不晓得大家看过这个台湾媒体的报道短片吗?像是2008的。面书的朋友share的。

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojiFTgXK4Cg



2011年3月9日星期三

白吃的午餐后,成倍的代价

从前有几个日本和外国同事,他们常年驻足在曼谷,是在花花世界打滚,成精成仙的角色。工作时可以上百小时的不眠不休,到岗位拉起衣袖不惜双手沾污,认真,像雇佣兵般的勇往直前。玩乐的时候,你是可想而知的。

这些人之间有个共同点,可以吃吃喝喝,喝酒唱歌玩乐,往往是最顶级最豪华的,不是问题。但在风花雪月那回事,每个人会坚持自己付费,不会让别人为自己买单。为什么?

日本人的阶级观念很深,社会长幼尊卑的纪律很严。是一个与我同等级的同事这样说的:

天下真的没有白吃的午餐。越是个人的,越是独特的,越是专程的,越是要让你白吃的;吃了后,你有一天要成倍的付出代价。这代价不一定是钱,可以是你的人格,你的专业,你个信用。要真的接受了别人安排给你免费的女人美色,你会在这些人的面前永远没有尊严和原则。

对不对?见仁见智,这就任由你自己决定好了。

我是看了国会报道,突然想到这样的往事。首相署在国会解释说:首相夫人出访中东3国家,15天花13万,没有花纳税人的钱,一切开销,是阿曼政府支付啦!

是什么?研讨教育素质管理啊?马来西亚有特殊成就是吗?首相夫人是这方面的专才吗?

是吗?首相夫人出访由别人买单,我们赚到吗?天掉下来的午餐?你肯定没有成倍的代价在后头吗?

伪装者

看他的虚伪,努力的,落力的演,也许是自演自看的尴尬,我感慨万分。

他要一个特别委员会,专门褫夺马来西亚国民的公民权,
那些向世界国外,通过媒体,破坏国家声誉者。
他说,家丑不可外扬!

如果把家丑外扬者,姑且不说这是诬蔑还是真有其事者,要被褫夺公民权!
那么,
那些在家里行暴者呢?
那些在家里强暴蹂躏自己女儿者呢?
那些,践踏民主,腐败,滥权,贪污自肥,党天下,鱼肉着马来西亚最下层的人民的政客呢?

在他那满口虔诚,捍卫神的神圣的背后,
如果他不是一个无神论者,
至少在他心中,神已经死了!

神啊!张开您的眼睛,看清这个假卫道吧!

2011年3月8日星期二

沙巴人民,你们为什么不生气?

副首相说:“这里没有发生饥荒饿死人,沙巴人民,你们别再埋怨州内的贫穷情况了!”

“TONGOD: Poor Sabahans should stop whinning and be satisfied with their lot because the poverty situation in Sabah was not as bad as that faced by citizens in China and India. Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin said that since starvation did not exist in Malaysia, there should be no complaints about the poverty situation in the state. Drawing comparisons with countries like China, India and other developed countries, he said that unlike others there had been no reports of people dying of starvation in Malaysia”。报道
对!沙巴人民,你们还奢求什么?
你们有穷得没有得吃吗?没有吧!
你们就该感恩了!感恩国阵政府!

你家的牲畜,不就是一天喂食2餐吗?
也没有饥饿啊!
那每天2次喂食,就是大恩大德了!
你们感恩吧!

犬儒

把这些人说是犬儒主义,是抬举。

每天早上上班,在路上,还是习惯性的听听电台新闻,
每回,新闻完了,就有个单元叫“新闻评述”。

天啊!“新闻评述”是这样的吗?
“新闻评述”后的,是血淋淋赤裸裸的, 成为执政党的宣传机器,为国阵宣传和歌颂,攻击对手。

在“新闻评述”的名,完全埋没媒体最珍贵的----- 考证,发掘真相,中立的定位,独立思考,宽阔的视野,具高度分析,明锐的触角,破除迷思,打破荒谬,开导理性全面思维。

这,是对专业媒体和媒体人的一种终极侮辱。

作为其中一份子,你还记得你的老师第一堂课在黑板写的“Journalism”的叮咛吗?

2011年3月7日星期一

马哈迪的困境和马来乐园

在印度,他们可能活在社会的最低层,
在印尼,他们的名字是“逃离者”,
在菲律宾,他们靠过路的船只要点不太光彩的财富,
在阿拉伯,他们把唯一的骆驼给吃掉了,
有的,是不尽的被鄙视。

来到这里,他在错综复杂的关系中,
看透了,捉住了每个群体的神经,
他的困境突破了。
在这片马来乐园里头,
他从最卑微,变成了主人,变成了王子和公主。

把世世代代的晦气和怨恨,苦难和贫困,
发泄在“非我”的群体上。

一个“民族”从此诞生。

2011年3月4日星期五

你同意马哈迪的说法吗?

他说:

这是马来土地(tanah  Melayu),所以马来人是主人,
马来西亚,只有马来人和非马来人之分, 马来西亚没有马来西亚人,非马来西亚人之分。

不管你来自哪里,只要你是回教徒,讲马来话,行马来传统,你就是马来人,
只要你是“马来人”,你就是主人, 不是移民。

不管你是不是世代生活在这里,缺一,你就不是马来人,
不是马来人,你就是外来的!就是移民来的,包括卡达山人,达雅人,杜顺人,Orang Asli!

作为一个独立国家,
马来西亚再创世界独一无二!
马来西亚没有国籍这回事,
马来西亚只有种族这回事。

这就是国阵的立场!没有人严正驳斥!
谬论说多了,普遍了,成了习惯法,成为真理。

你认知的国家宪法是这样的吗?
你同意的话,请支持国阵吧!

还可以咩?

A:勋衔这样封,差不多每个人都是了喔,以后怎样?

B:你少担心啦,Datoo'完,不是Datoo' Seri咯!Datoo' Seri 完,不是Datoo' Seri Panglima咯,Panglima完,不是什么Utama咯!Utama后,可Paling Utama 吗!Paling Paling Utama也可以吗,Mega Palling Paling Utama叻,Maha Mega Paling Paling Seri Seri Utama 不行咩?

你怕什么怕?

A:听说马来西亚因贪污每年流失的资金数以百亿计,马来西亚这样下去会很惨!听说,可能会破产的。

B:你怕什么怕!马来西亚还有邦阁岛没有卖,还有Langkawi没有卖,还有神山没有卖,还有Labuan没有卖,还有西巴丹岛没有卖,还有酱多森林地没有卖,还有酱多马来西亚人可以出口当女佣,还有酱多AP可以卖,还有酱多勋衔可以孝敬,你少担心啦!地下还有很多油和天然气叻!Don't worry, be happy! 你不信我?你看我样子像坏人咩?

少数服从多数!多数可以欺负少数?

首先,这个家伙肯定不是神经病,绝对脑袋清醒。

他说, 印度人,印尼人,阿拉伯人,菲律宾人游泳过来的,就不是叫移民(immigrant),
其他,华人游泳过来的,就叫做外来者,移民!

根据这个“医生”,“移民”的定义,不是一种行动和过程;“移民”是一种生活方式,信仰和语言选择。

你明白了,为什么会有BTN,阿默依斯迈,依布拉欣阿里这样的猖狂?!
你明白了,为什么当年英国大学拒绝给他学位吗?!
你知道了,实现扶持政策,强把不合格的推上位,强给不够能力的保留学额的后果吗?

如果称其他非巫裔为寄居者,是天大的罪过,
这样明目张胆的谬论,你为什么不生气呢?

2011年3月3日星期四

绅士的拿捏

好了,我就把一切,你认为是针对你的偏见放一旁。假设,你真的是一位绅士。

作为一个绅士,他最珍贵的,是他的名声。
名声,源自他顶天立地,光明磊落,维护正义的行为举止。

在你选择当个马来西亚华裔政治人物,又想被人认为你是位绅士时,难吗?
难的,是在你衡量利益权势得失的拿捏,绝对不是绅士对事情黑白的辨识。

绅士们,与其大声的在报章,自己讲要大家爽,扬言从哪里跌倒从哪里站回起来,疾呼你的问心无愧,说要勤政爱民;你那里履行了绅士该做职责?

历届首相下达命令,议员在国会和州议会,必须要根据党的意愿投票,而不是自然公义为准。结果,在沙巴发展走廊(SDC)法案里头,作为主导SDC的单位,SEDIA拥有免控权(immunity),你确确实实让这样的法案在2009年过关!

签了一张没有银码,没有台头的支票,任由挥霍人民纳税钱。有一天要追究责任时,你能宣称你的无辜,坚持你的绅士身份待遇吗?你配吗?

轻与重

一个念头,哪怕是一闪而过,可以是多么的轻浮,水过不留痕。
很多时候,坚持一个信念的时间点,却是如此的重。

当权势咄咄逼人,舍近求远,要在沙巴建煤炭发电厂时,
一个正义的信念,敢于公开自己打抱不平立场的善念,
为正义雪中送炭的勇气,
它的分量,是远胜过,
在人民力量下被取消的煤炭发电厂后,锦上添花,事后孔明,邀功的官腔。

明福案,自贸区丑闻,丑闻,丑闻,在各种法令,政策下,更多更多的丑闻进行时,
你选择沉默,一念的明哲保身,保官职私利;叫它“政治现实”,
这一念,岂止是轻可以了得?

在一切苦苦熬过来,稍露曙光,
是贪污滥权,是谋害人命,是掠夺民脂民膏,是政治迫害,是践踏民主,是执法不公等等,
你一句,“是个人行为,不代表党,没有必要道歉”,
你这个与这个邪恶划清界限的念头,已经没有了半点的重量。

政客啊!依附在权贵下的官商!披羊皮社会贤达,狐假虎威,鱼肉人民的伪君子们,
这里有你生存的空间吗?