2011年12月17日星期六

他妈的沙巴行动党,你有没有搞错啊!

多少次,沙巴行动党的邱庆州,不是恣意妄为?难看的吃相,被揭露后,丑态毕露。当然,每次批评沙巴行动党后,总是有些人按耐不了,马上跳出来说,学林吉祥有什么错?学林吉祥没错,但这等第一届议员还没有执政,就烂到这种程度,就是叫人“顶唔顺”!

官商勾结变相填海,连执政党的部长也受不了勒令计划停工,邱庆州做什么?身份对调,为计划辩护。慕沙为私人理由,要Wisma Khidmat改建为医院,专业团体社无不鞭笞,邱庆州独排众议,支持沙巴巫统的私人议程。会这等的忠心耿耿,沙巴巫统首席部长慕沙能不爱死他吗?

好了!昨天说到沙巴委派独家经营河沙开采权的事情。

沙巴土地测量局天大的胆,敢自罢自为宣布,把全沙巴开采河沙的独家经营权交给SEDCO?肯定是首席部长的“祝福和叮咛”啦!

今天,不出所料,没几个执政党的部长议员敢冒犯人民利益表态支持的。邱庆州作为沙巴几个反对党议员,又来发挥他作为沙巴巫统国阵和慕沙阿曼,优秀执政的忠实支持者的角色。就是护主或是PLP啦!

你看这样烂的藉口,民主行动党籍的沙巴州亚庇区国会议员,邱庆州可以认同:

“Under the new system, the responsibility about sand theft would no longer exist, we no longer need to enforce because all the sand is already exclusive to SEDCO. So SEDCO has to take care of it, meaning the Government would no longer need to waste resources guarding against sand thieves, because all would be taken care of by SEDCO themselves."-- 土地测量局说

(1)哦!州政府管理就有偷采,给了SEDCO就没有偷采-----这是什么道理?

(2)SEDCO 需要take care(照顾)沙巴的河沙资源-----政府就没有责任?

(3)政府不必Waste Resources (浪费资源)来执法和杜绝偷采活动----- SEDCO需要吗?捍卫国家资源和执行法律,杜绝偷采,是叫浪费资源吗?

(4)Exclusive(独家)给了SEDCO就没有偷采!-----因为一切在不该开采的地方开采,只要SEDCO同意,就不算偷采啦?

Osman said contractors whose licenses have expired could still continue their businesses by applying to be an agent of SEDCO, and it is up to the monopoly holder to decide the criteria for the appointment.“I think good operators will be accepted by SEDCO, whichever that has the quality, has their own machineries and so on.“Actually this method is faster and more effective, as anyone who wants to deal with sand mining would only need to go to SEDCO.
邱庆州,你是同意河沙给独家经营,就更加快速,有效率?!
这样可以减轻土地测量局的工作,那这些人做什么的?
所以这些政府公务员是白吃白喝的?
公务员做事慢吞吞官僚作风是不需要改的?
行动党认为斩脚趾避沙虫是最好的方法?

政府部门要求不来,邱庆州你凭什么认为SEDCO可以/需要/会更透明,更负责任?!!!
减轻警察执法浪费资源,不如给私人公司外包如何?
不如外包海关如何?不如外包法庭如何?

如果什么火箭超人会骂人!邱庆州,你well deserve,
TIUUUUUUUUUUU, PKM!KNN!死扑街!
为了一点点地好处,你指鹿为马!助纣为虐!你walking street orange!

2011年12月16日星期五

阿公分家产咩!

天啊!这是什么世界?!

如果你阿爷分自己的家产,谁有权力多说一句?
但是整个沙巴州的河沙开采权,你把它当是自家财产,分给SEDCO。

SEDCO说是官营,谁不知道是执行80%固打土著议程的公司?
把权利从政府机构,转移给一群‘商人’,
政府从此放弃了这块行政决策,执法权。

以后沙巴谁要开采河沙的执照,你就求SEDCO吧!
不单独家垄断,还要看他喜不喜欢你!
反正他喜欢你,你就是乱乱采,SEDCO同时作为‘业主’和执法者就可以保你!
他不喜欢你,连看也不看你!

以后沙巴的建筑业,大至建大楼,小至家门前补两块砖,
大大小小产业,楼价屋价,你们就看SEDCO的慈悲咯!

你反对党就来执政咯!反正,可以分的都分完了!
继续执政,反正就是自己裙带机构得利,
这就是沙巴国阵!

这是所有国阵精神中坚支持议员的历史责任!
百林,于墨斋,杨爱华,丘克海,陈树杰,区锦华,Peter Pang, 彭育民,张志刚。。。

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
转载Borneo Posts报导:SEDCO to get sand ‘monopoly’

by Murib Morpi. Posted on December 16, 2011, Friday

KOTA KINABALU: The Land and Survey Department has proposed Sabah Economic Development Corporation (SEDCO) be given the monopoly to all the sand mining activities in Sabah, starting June next year.

Its director Datuk Osman Jamal, in proposing this yesterday, said it would help eliminate issues related to sand theft that state authorities currently have to deal with.

“We will use the first six months next year to prepare the paperwork and work out the mechanism and so on, taking into consideration the interest of everyone,” he told reporters after the closing of the Land and Survey Department and Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Roundtable Discussion here, yesterday.

Osman said the department would come up with a resolution on the proposal and meet with all the contractors involved to gather their views and inputs so that the mechanism to be developed would be best for all parties, namely the government, SEDCO and the operators.

According to Osman, the proposed exclusive mining rights approach has actually been agreed in principal by the State Government a few years ago but was not implemented due to the absence of a suitable mechanism and the need to give the operators time to get returns from their investment in sand mining activities.

“But come June next year, no sand excavation licenses would be renewed. Existing licenses will however be continued until they expire, and after that SEDCO can take over. For areas where there is no active license, SEDCO can go ahead,” he said.

Osman said contractors whose licenses have expired could still continue their businesses by applying to be an agent of SEDCO, and it is up to the monopoly holder to decide the criteria for the appointment.


“I think good operators will be accepted by SEDCO, whichever that has the quality, has their own machineries and so on.

“Actually this method is faster and more effective, as anyone who wants to deal with sand mining would only need to go to SEDCO.

“This time we will only need to issue one license, so we cut the time, no more bureaucracy.

“When SEDCO deal with business people, their ways are different. With the government you’ll have to follow all this time consuming procedures,” he said.

Osman said that from the state’s point of view, this is the best approach in managing the sand resources as it would ensure no revenue losses due to sand dredging.

He said the Government will charge SEDCO in advance based on the volume of the sand, which will be determined by the Geoscience Department.

Asked if the Government could assure there would be no or less illegal sand mining once the monopoly is in place, he said SEDCO would be inclined to monitor sand theft activities as basically it would be their property that would be stolen and not the Government’s.

This would allow the department to utilise its enforcement officers to focus more on other tasks, such as detecting encroachment on state land, he said.

“This will allow us to concentrate on other matters, so a lot of good things will come from this,” he said.

“Under the new system, the responsibility about sand theft would no longer exist, we no longer need to enforce because all the sand is already exclusive to SEDCO.

“So SEDCO has to take care of it, meaning the Government would no longer need to waste resources guarding against sand thieves, because all would be taken care of by SEDCO themselves,” he said.

According to Osman, the contractors have yet to be informed about the proposed move.

Asked if SEDCO had the mechanism and capability to monitor sand theft, he said: “Right now the department has to look out for sand theft because the sand still belongs to the government, but in this case SEDCO will pay us in advance so there will be no losses to the Government.”

As to who will take action against sand thieves, he indicated that SEDCO as the “owner” may be given certain powers to deal with the problem.

2011年12月14日星期三

宁恶斗小人,别为难君子

中华民族的历史和文明是多元深厚璀璨的。当然,像其他文明一样,在光芒照耀不到的地方,还是有些阴暗的。作家柏杨把中华民族的乱,脏,吵;一盘散沙的民族性;儒家的明哲保身的自私性,等等,叫酱缸文化。

个人认为,这一切的一切缘由,是人们对小人的过度容忍,甚至是对小人的膜拜延伸出来的。我们民族对于恶势力叩头,供奉,奉养的状况是特别盛行的。对孤魂野鬼的行贿拜拜,根本上,就是莫得罪小人!奉上香烛元宝,请行个方便,别来搞我如此。对地方有势力的土地爷爷,上神台,不上神台的,同样就是莫得罪小人。

‘宁得罪君子,莫得罪小人’是什么样的精神状况?得罪君子,他碍于大体,不好意思说出口,最重要就是君子得罪了不怕他报复,而得罪小人可是暗箭难防,泼辣打闹就不好惹了。基本上就是欺善怕恶的一种最原始的表现。因此,中华民族对于绅士风度这回事是不屑一顾,甚至会心生鄙视,没有半点容忍的空间。相反的,对行恶的,施暴的,总称就是小人的行为举止,人们相信老祖宗的明哲保身百忍成金的金玉良言,是多么了不起的智慧。

深深体会这样的道理,一些人塑性开始当起小人来了。我甚至斗胆的说一句,一般上吃得开的,十之八九是大大小小的恶霸;没几个是真正的大善人。因为,周围的人不都欺善怕恶吗?人们不都‘宁得罪君子,莫得罪小人吗’?这样的社会,小人还是特别多的。小人特别多的社会,能体现出什么了不起的精神面貌和远大的目光?

谁说做个君子就注定要被那些,目光短浅追逐蝇头小利的小人欺负?谁说君子就要退一步,忍一时,息事宁人?谁说自认烂命一条的,就可以横着走,要别人忍让退步?够了!下回遇到小人,要狠狠的斗,斗到他倒下,斗到最后一滴!

一个正常的社会,本来就应该是‘恶斗小人,别为难君子’好不好!

2011年12月13日星期二

东方式的真小人

东方式的真小人是,

眼见你的礼貌容忍和沉默,他越过你们的中间线,一个脚站在你的空间,

找到下一个机会,他会把它中间线涂掉,在自己站的地方画旁另一条中间线,

当你终于把话说出口‘哎!这中间线是在这里吧!’,

他看死你怕小人的心态,他退了一些,把扭曲的中间线挪退一些,却把这线图上红红的彩色。



你终于找来裁判,重新鉴定界限,

他会找来个伪装成智慧长者的说客,说‘哎!这种事情私下解决就好,不必惊动那个’,

这时他会伪装成受害者,从加害者身份把自己说成弱势,博取同情,

重点一转,他们说起心胸,说起大方,说起迁就。



个人这样,群体这样,政党这样,民族这样,国家也这样。

墨斋请愿


中文成语很多时候,都有多丰富的历史典故,供后人省思和警惕。

纵观今天的马来西亚包括沙巴政坛,多半尽是乌合之众,小丑的行为,找吃的动机,无赖的脸皮,滥竽充数的无耻。做成语的题材大概不少吧?

国阵这个执政马来西亚近半个世纪的政府,是禁止马来西亚人民使用Astro以外的碟型卫星广播接收器。大概为的是资讯垄断,强迫人民接收TV1,2,3的那种执政党喉舌,政党宣传机器;扭曲事实,煽动人民,为的是打击对手,牢牢捉着政权为目的。

于墨斋贵为沙巴执政政府,的副首席部长,兼任州资源发展和资讯工艺部长,加上与他同一个政党的联邦政府的科学革新部长,恰恰就是主管新兴工艺方面的执政政府的要员。沙巴团结党于墨斋搞民间请愿,说是以‘人民’的身份来搞。

唉!那为什么要像老百姓,非政府组织,反对党在体系外施压和反映意愿?
执政政府里头听取人民声音民意的管道呢?
执政党内部的沟通管道呢?
难道内阁里头不能说话吗?
要是内阁部长在国会动议修改法令,难道还有人会反对吗?
可惜他们都没有这样做该做的事。

一个胸无大志,却贪图官位名利,穷途末路的政客;在走头无路,在汹涌民意漩涡下快要没顶的时候,捉着什么,奋力一博,来伪装自己的无能为力,来伪装自己平时政绩的平庸。

于是,关起门来在自己的书香墨斋搞请愿,叫别人来请愿诉求;然后再来一个自我实现的预言(self-fulling prophecy),把偷了抢了亏欠别人的,还给别人。然后希望得到你的感谢和选票。

恰恰暴露出来的,是他的力不从心无能为力,平庸和助纣为虐的事实。

这,称为‘墨斋请愿’。

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
转载:(本报亚庇7日讯)州资源发展及资讯工艺部长拿督于墨斋医生吁请公众,到新设立的请愿网站http://www.freedom2info.com/,投票发表本身对政府天碟(大耳朵)政策之意见。


有关网站主题为:我们反对大马法律禁民间用大锅天线,人民有安装卫星天线/大耳朵的自由,同意、反对、没意见,任填;欲知投票结果者,可留下电邮地址。截至今日下午4时16分,经有247人到该网站投票,96%计237人投赞成票,3.2%计8人投反对票及2人没有意见,76人完全不回应。 于氏是今日在其部门召开记者会时,如此表示。

他希望公众踊跃到该网站投票和发表意见,不论是赞成或反对,调查结果也非常透明化,让当局了解公众的意见。 受询调查结果公布后他将采取什么行动时,部长表示,他会将调查成绩呈交当局,并交由当局决定采取下一步行动。“我不知他们要采取什么行动,但我认为,他们应该允许民间按装卫星天碟,至于法律方面要如何修正,那是他们的工作,他们应该知道要怎么处理。”

受询他是否用部长名衔来率领这项行动时,他说,他是以「公民」的身份来处理这件事。由于卫星天碟法令乃属联邦政府管辖的权力,受询其他州属是否会支持他的是项行动时,他说,希望如此。

“若他们认为这是很重要的事情,希望全国人民都来投票支持,因这不只是沙巴的问题罢了,要修改的是联邦法令。” 至于这项网上投票运动将为期多久,于氏说,也许数星期,总之不会长达一年那么久。 他重申,在这资讯自由的年代,以过时的法令限制人民装置卫星天线,是不切实际、不合理及剥夺民间通讯自由。